Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Health preserving class - The director of a kindergarten in Xi 'an said, "There are no rural babies, only swans and no pigs." what do you think?
The director of a kindergarten in Xi 'an said, "There are no rural babies, only swans and no pigs." what do you think?
What Xi 'an kindergarten director said and her behavior of treating students differently have always happened in the real society, and she is no longer a case. Only under the call of national policies, many schools dare not do so blatantly, and even form an invisible "hidden rule" that sets various conditions for enrollment.

Due to the development trend of the country's urbanization speed, it has promoted the large-scale flow of population. In many cities, "difficulty in going to school" has become a common problem. Local students depend on the school district or hukou, and even have to shake the number to decide whether they can enter the school. Especially the children of migrant workers, it is even more difficult to go to school. So this layer of discrimination has formed in society.

People with superior family conditions want their children to enjoy a better education, and even spend a lot of money to send their children to aristocratic schools. They think it is possible to reach out to "upper class" people and expand their contacts and social circles. If the school lowers the threshold and accepts unqualified students, it will treat such students with a discriminatory eye.

People with ordinary family conditions also want to use their children to go to school to show off their status. Many of them are farmers, but they use the school level to divide classes. When talking to such parents, you can obviously feel their strong sense of superiority.

Under the influence of this potential class consciousness, even the children of rural families who have the conditions to enter the so-called "aristocratic schools" will be looked down upon by some people with colored glasses. Just like this teacher in Xi 'an, he compares babies in the countryside to pigs. In their eyes, education is "first-class", and they think that children in cities are swans with noble birth. No matter how hard they try, rural children are still just a "hillbilly".

Therefore, as a teacher, she does not have the professional quality of a qualified teacher, does not teach indiscriminately, and does not respect and treat students equally. She is just a realistic "social person", a businessman whose interests are supreme. Her extreme remarks in her post as a teacher will surely become a target of public criticism.

Only raise swans and not pigs! As an enlightenment teacher, make such remarks! The teacher's morality is extremely bad! You don't have to raise swans, but it's your job to cultivate pigs into swans!

The ancients "Saint Amethyst" said: "At the beginning of life, human nature is good. Sex is similar and learning is far away. " In other words, when people are born, their minds are basically the same. Because of the influence of acquired environment and education, great changes have taken place in human nature! This is also the reason why parents want their children to get a good education for thousands of years! Not studying and not receiving education is not the mainstream of the Chinese nation! Not accepted by the public!

In the eyes of teachers with good ethics, there is no distinction between "pig" children and "swan" children! Instead of saying that the child is a pig or a swan, you should subconsciously think that his parents are pigs or swans! Because of your cognition: the parents of children are hierarchical! Three, six, nine!

People's quality is taught! The child is a pig and the child is a swan. They are similar in gender, and the quality of growth is because they are far apart! The burden of responsibility for this teaching falls on your teacher's shoulders!

It is a false proposition to teach only "swan" children and not "pig" children! It's already a swan. Why teach? "Pig" told you to teach! And your job is to teach pigs to be swans!

The headmaster made such remarks! That means she is not a qualified teacher! And a leader! It can only show that this is the sorrow of education! There are serious problems with the academic qualifications of this chief teacher! The chaos in the education sector can be seen from this tube, which can be seen!

In the video, the language of kindergarten is amazing: "Our teacher is the leader of preschool education. I learned the skills of raising swans from him. I can't raise pigs. We can be nonprofit, but I can't be nonprofit. The neighborhood office asked me to talk about kindergarten diversion. How many children do you accept? My exact words were, not one. I said I didn't look down on the countryside. For example, those children who work to sell vegetables and fish. If I drop to 1200, a large number of such children will come in, because the threshold is lowered, and then you will find your children mixed up, and then you will start learning together ... "

After watching this video, xu teacher Jr. wondered how an educator could say such a thing with such confidence and strength.

According to the director's thinking, her kindergarten can't reduce its price and become an inclusive non-profit kindergarten, because then the children of the working people at the bottom will flood in and the kindergarten will become a "pig factory".

Inferred by her thinking logic, the children of the rich who can afford the high tuition fees in kindergartens are "swans", while the children of the working people at the bottom are "pigs". In this way, our children who are teachers are even less worthy to be "swans", because our wages are lower than those who sell vegetables and fish. The monthly income of selling fried dough sticks can reach 30 thousand, and that of selling vegetables and fish can reach 10 thousand.

The ancients said: "At the beginning of life, human nature is good and similar, far from learning from each other. If you don't teach, it's natural and moving, and the way to teach is expensive. " People are willing to pay high prices to send their children to better kindergartens precisely because they want their children to get a better education, rather than being discriminated against and labeled. At the beginning of education, it should be the education of truth, goodness and beauty, not the utilitarian and snobbish education.

As a teacher, xu teacher Jr. has children from rich families and children from poor families in his class. We don't think that children from poor families are inferior and have bad natures. On the contrary, some children from poor families study harder and know how to be tolerant and considerate of others, and these qualities are often beyond money.

I don't know why the director uses professional and family material conditions to evaluate the essence of a child. Maybe in her eyes, as long as he has money, everything is fine. Does the director only have money in his eyes?

Little xu teacher doesn't know what kind of parents dare to send their children to such a kindergarten. Who can guarantee that their children will not be compared with others in such a kindergarten, and who can guarantee that their children can be cultivated into pure "swans" by the director?

In such an environment, how many parents have to scramble to prove that their children are pure-bred "swans", and how will their children be raised in such an environment? Will the absence of a class be discriminated against, or the absence of an activity be discriminated against?

As a teacher and an enlightener of children, how can you bear to convey the vulgar snobbery of society to children?

Although some people in society are mercenary and snobbish, and take the amount of money as the only criterion to evaluate people, educators can't. If educators become snobbish and look at students from different families with colored glasses, then the students' three views can be correct, and where will our society go?

In the future education, there must be people with great feelings, high cultivation and broad mind to lead students from different classes to discover their infinite possibilities and absorb the fragrance brought by knowledge, so that everyone can get its true meaning regardless of grade. what do you think?

Thank you for inviting me! I have been engaged in early childhood education for many years and met all kinds of parents. It's the first time I heard that only swans are raised, not pigs. My kindergarten is a public park, which enrolls students for all children. There is no need for indicators and no need to find relationships. It is not difficult to enter the park, and many people want to squeeze in. But in order to control the number of people, I stopped talking when I was full.

Next to our kindergarten are some ordinary residents. Some sell vegetables, some sell beef and some sell sunshine milk. There are all walks of life, but no one is a big official. There are still many mothers who have no job, take care of their children at home and have a low education level. Only a few parents are educated intellectuals and know education very well. According to the director, most of the children we recruit are "pigs", only a few swans or two! Aren't you sad?

Are we all learning the technology of raising pigs? Don't!

Let me talk about my skills first. I learned the skills of raising swans. I am an American lecturer in active parenting and school, and also a national senior family education tutor and lecturer. I have many other identities, so I won't go into them here. I am deeply rooted in the field of education. I have given my parents educational lectures in kindergarten for many years, and they all thank me! And the children of these parents are called "pigs" by others. Can you think about it, am I raising a "pig" with the technology of raising swans? I'm not exhausted, I can still communicate with my parents.

Confucius once said that education should teach students in accordance with their aptitude. Teaching without distinction refers to the universality of education, and teaching students in accordance with their aptitude refers to the uniqueness of education. No matter who you are, you can get an education. Teaching students in accordance with their aptitude means that teachers choose learning methods suitable for each student's characteristics.

In other words, swans and pigs have the right to education. As an educator, you should be more caring and spread your love to every child instead of discriminating against them. When we find it difficult to communicate with each other, we can try to change our roles and language communication methods. Don't put yourself in a high position, and communicate with your parents equally. It will be difficult at work, but we must accept these children.

In our kindergarten, there are many such family situations. Parents are divorced or working outside, and the children are brought by grandparents and become left-behind children. Because in these children's families, the way of upbringing is neglect of discipline and laissez-faire, which leads them to have no sense of rules at all. Teachers also find it difficult to educate these children.

In our yard, there is such a child who is brought up by her grandmother all the year round. Whenever something happens to a child, we only communicate with the elderly. Sometimes I still wear a pair of big shoes to go to kindergarten, which is inconvenient to walk. Children often come to kindergarten at half past ten and don't even attend classes. Grandma didn't respond when we communicated with her.

There are so many such parents in our hospital. Whenever the teacher reflects these situations to the leader, the leader is also very helpless. She said, we have to accept them, otherwise, where can they accept them when they leave kindergarten? These children will only be worse! Besides, we have no reason to drive these children away. They all have the right to education. I thought about it carefully, and what the leader said is really reasonable. Therefore, sometimes when we are at work, although there will be complaints, in the end the teacher will treat every child equally!

You can't just keep swans without "pigs" Otherwise, there will be more and more "little pigs" in the future, which is not conducive to the development of families and the whole society. This is a distorted concept. If the whole society wants to develop harmoniously, it must be balanced. The same is true of education. I believe that under the nourishment and tolerance of teachers' love, these "little pigs" will gradually become beautiful and lovely swans.

This year, the Ministry of Education issued regulations to improve the behavior of kindergartens, and community kindergartens should gradually become inclusive and non-profit kindergartens. This is also the aspiration of the people and the general trend. However, recently, the director of a kindergarten in Xi 'an made a big statement and told the Education Bureau and the village director why she didn't want to be an inclusive kindergarten: "We learned the skills of raising swans, but we can't raise pigs."

In this director's view, their kindergartens have invested heavily, targeting the elite, which is what she calls "swans". But once the inclusive kindergarten is built, the children in the village, the children who sell fish and vegetables, that is, the "pigs" she thinks, will blend in and affect the "swans" in the garden, so she is unwilling to make the kindergarten inclusive.

Is there a class in society? Are people high and low? Textbooks tell us no, in fact, most people still have it in their hearts. It's just that the standards of "swan" and "pig" are not the same. Some people measure money, some people measure status, and some people measure quality and accomplishment.

The director's words caused public outrage because he stated his own standards. The rich are swans and the poor are pigs.

Because this kindergarten is private, it is up to her to decide whether it is inclusive or not, and she will not be forced to do it. You can find other reasons to shirk and delay for a while.

However, the director doesn't know whether he is inexperienced or fearless and straightforward. How can he offend a large number of people in one sentence without causing public outrage? This is an IQ that needs to be recharged!

The world of adults is hierarchical. The income of a star who plays a play casually is equivalent to the lifelong labor of ordinary people. Some officials go out surrounded by endless scenery, while many ordinary people can only go out to work alone. These are all intentional or unintentional class divisions.

However, I think it is best not to divide children into different grades, otherwise the poor will receive relatively backward education, and the rich can take the lead from kindergarten and enjoy elite education. Then the class may solidify and the gap between the rich and the poor will widen.

Seeing this sentence, I think of many big cities such as Beijing and Shanghai, and I often hear similar words, that is, tell foreigners to get out of here and think about their locals.

Similar to this kind of geographical discrimination, household registration discrimination, I often feel dumbfounding.

Because, basically, everyone's life is not easy, and they all face unattainable housing prices and the same smog pollution. How can you feel superior?

Speaking of children in rural areas, I think that if the regional economic development is similar and the teaching resources are similar, no one should want to toss the school district and go to any advanced kindergarten, right?

In Japan, students go to school nearby and children go to and from school by themselves. If there is a choice, I think every parent wants their children to do so.

Many people say that it is not wrong for the director of the school to just put the hidden rules on the table, but isn't this really a terrible place? Why do our children learn to discriminate first and face eccentricity first when they are so young?

I remember my primary school, too. I knew I had to give gifts to my teachers. I know that teachers not only like those with good grades, but also those with money at home.

From elementary school to high school, rich children are always teachers' godchildren and daughters. Further, they are similar to the bosses of my mother's company, with assets of hundreds of millions. Although her grades are poor, she is directly the goddaughter of the principal of a national key high school.

In junior high school, the monitor of a class next door was the child of a government official, although the child's grades were poor and he made trouble everywhere.

You see, on campus and in textbooks, I tell you that no matter how fair and equal it is, there is no distinction between high and low professions, but life ironically teaches your children other facts.

So, where is the root cause?

That is to say, showing respect is not an expression in books. This practical respect needs to be implemented in real life.

I sincerely hope that people with similar discrimination will think about it. If they are given a choice, none of them want to leave their homes and give their children a noble life. Many of them are not even lazy. They get up early and get greedy every day, but this is the reality.

Speaking of this, some people may say, who told them to be lazy, who told them to do such work, and who told them to stop studying and do some good work?

Let's talk about laziness, delivery, restaurant work, shopping, factory workers, construction sites. Dare you say they are lazy? They must be tired.

At this time, some people say that they didn't study hard. What can they do?

But think about it, are they all born in a family where they can study at will? Do parents love them, eat and drink, and give them a good reading environment?

The reality of this society is that compulsory education was not so popular in the past, and everyone was generally poor. Many people may even be abused because they are daughters, but they were born in a patriarchal family, didn't study, or met bad parents.

So, how can you ignore everything and attack others easily because you are from a good family?

Speaking of discrimination, shouldn't it be a criminal? Shouldn't it be someone who cheats and discriminates?

A person should be respected as long as he works hard, is diligent and does not hurt others.

However, there are too many people who look at money unilaterally like this director. No matter how this household registration comes from and how the other party makes money, as long as it has money, it must be a swan.

People like this, I hope that one day when you face other injustices, exploitation and discrimination, you can also say frankly, whoever makes me poor, I should kneel on the ground.

"We are learning the technology of raising swans and will not raise pigs. The village director of Ducheng Village asked me to send all the babies in the village here. I disagree, because the quality of these children is too low. " When parents asked why inclusive fees were not fully implemented, "Cui Yuanchang", the person in charge of the nursery of China Railway Shangdu City, responded in this way.

In this matter, I thought of two questions:

First, why did this overbearing director make these remarks:

Why don't kindergarten directors implement inclusive fees? The person in charge of the kindergarten explained that because this kindergarten takes the elite education route, swan education should be implemented. If Pratt & Whitney is implemented, all the children will come, and those with low quality (selling vegetables and fish) will also come. What used to be a kindergarten for raising swans will become an education for raising pigs. If you say so, wouldn't it be simple? Give them food and drinks. Especially for the so-called swan children, you are swans, and I taught your to be a swan. Would you like those pigs to come in with you? It seems that from the perspective of parents, it is reasonable to raise children in the city but belittle children in the village. However, the children in these villages don't care whether you raise swans or pigs. What they care about is the accusation. Therefore, the director's metaphor is totally inappropriate and should be explained according to the main demands of these parents, rather than belittling children with such metaphors.

Second, our education can raise swans and pigs.

Why does the director say that the quality of children in the village is too low, and the children who sell vegetables and fish are inferior? Where is the low quality reflected? Is it behavior habit or family background? If it is a habit of behavior, it does not mean that the quality is low. Didn't you see the BMW driver throw milk boxes and cigarette butts on the side of the road? If they come from a family, there are hundreds of millions of farmers in our country, but they actually contribute to this country with their simple labor, and their quality is not low at all, even noble. Didn't they pile up every brick and tile in the city? Aren't they picking up city garbage? Those who sell vegetables and fish are of low quality and can't communicate with them. How do you communicate with them when you buy vegetables or fish? Aren't you going to buy these? Without these vegetable sellers and fish sellers, the life of you high-quality people will not be guaranteed.

If it's a dialect problem, you deny the quality of these people and think they can't communicate. Isn't this contrary to our efforts to protect dialects all over the country? Isn't it good to let children love the language and culture of their hometown?

At present, the director's comments have aroused parents' dissatisfaction, caused serious negative effects, and have been taken care of by the company, which is also a relatively comprehensive explanation.

I really want to ask the kindergarten director: Is your child a swan or a pig?

Do you use the skills of raising swans or pigs to raise children?

If your child is a swan, what makes you say that other people's children are pigs!

Were you a swan or a pig when you were a child?

In my opinion, you are not as elegant and noble as a swan. When you say such a thing, it goes without saying that you have classified yourself as an "animal"! !

It's hard to believe that a kindergarten director can be so domineering, so forceful, angry and boastful. Who gave you such confidence and courage?

The standard of kindergarten teachers doesn't matter, you are naive. Really treat yourself like a dish!

When we condemn the kindergarten director in succession, we can't help asking, who gave the kindergarten director such confidence?

1. There is a relative shortage of preschool education institutions, which leads to a shortage of degrees. Preschool education does not belong to compulsory education, does not enroll students, belongs to fee-based education, and follows market rules. When demand exceeds supply, it is inevitable that the seller will take the opportunity to raise the price. When the supply exceeds the demand, you can see it and promise to greet you with a smile. I can't wait to beg you to send the children there. Now that the second child policy has been liberalized, the number of children has increased greatly, and there is a relative shortage of early childhood education institutions and a shortage of degrees.

Two days ago, I personally experienced the nervousness of a child entering the park. A well-known local kindergarten said in advance that it is no problem for children to enter the park, but I still want to grab a degree through normal channels so as not to bother asking for help. Online registration will start at 9: 00 on the 20th, until the quota is full. I switched classes with my partner in advance and found some colleagues to stay by the computer. I want to compete with each other through multiple computers. As long as one of them gets it, it's a success. At that time, we were on the edge of the enemy. At 9 o'clock, we'll start filling out the form and submitting it immediately. To tell the truth, it only took 2 minutes, and it only took 2 minutes from opening the webpage to submitting it. When I submitted it, it showed that the registration quota was full, and the registration stopped! My colleague is quick at typing. It's okay to type three or four thousand words an hour, but I still don't report it. It is said that all the newspapers are in Internet cafes, and several people are required to sign up at the same time, and the details of the children have been typed in advance, so just copy and paste them. Although careful preparations were made in advance, it still fell short.

It is said that several other well-known kindergartens have signed up, and this has also happened. There is no degree in online registration.

Why is this happening? It is because there are fewer really high-quality kindergartens, and the number of children is increasing rapidly.

In the final analysis, the reason why the director of that kindergarten is bullying in the field is because there is no shortage of students in this kindergarten.

2. Kindergarten management is disorderly and lacks necessary constraints. Kindergarten is not compulsory education. They have the right to recruit students independently and the right to screen students. That's understandable. But it must conform to certain moral standards, the words and deeds of practitioners must conform to educational principles, and the fees must be reasonable, so as to show the high-end of their kindergartens. Now many kindergartens think that imported goods can live in, and practitioners talk big, which makes people angry and disgusting. The words and deeds of the kindergarten director are definitely not personal actions. We have a government kindergarten here, which clearly stipulates that children whose parents are civil servants can enter the park. Single employees and children from other families will not be admitted, even children living in their neighborhood can't get in. Those children who enter the park, because their parents are in the institution, have actually established contact with each other. Residents nearby are also very angry. I didn't expect such a wonderful rule. But there's nothing I can do.

What worries parents even more is that the cost of kindergartens has soared. In the past, it was more than one month 1000, but now some kindergartens have risen to several thousand. Many kindergartens I know have raised their fees. They all advertise that their kindergartens are aimed at children from high-end families and let them enjoy high-end education. I know a kindergarten nearby that costs 6000 yuan a month.

This wonderful regulation of kindergartens, the abnormal language of preschool education practitioners frequently appears, and the price is arbitrarily raised, which reflects that the entry threshold of kindergartens is too low, the quality of practitioners is mixed, and the management is in a disorderly state.

Although the director who specializes in raising swans has made rude remarks, she has never heard of what kind of industry norms she is restricted by, nor what price she paid for her inappropriate remarks. This shows that our management of kindergartens needs to be strengthened!

The director of the school is really "silent and keeps talking". Can people from "pig farmers" raise "swans"? It's really doubtful.

Tracing back from this sentence, the director is a native of rural areas, no more than three generations. A person who has just left the countryside turns to look down on his compatriots. Such a "forgetful" person is morally corrupt from the beginning. Can a person with life problems engage in preschool education?

The prosperity, beauty and prosperity of a city cannot be separated from the tens of thousands of migrant workers in Qian Qian. When they finally have a place in the city, they want their children to change their destiny through reading, so they send their children to the city to study, but they don't know how sad it is to hear such vulgar and shallow words!

Democracy, equality and fairness have become the core values of our society. This sentence also exposed the director's "three views". How can such a person deserve to be a child's first education? What kind of educational concept will the kindergarten under the leadership of such a director be: instilling its own unequal educational concept into students?

Really terrible, this is a typical "pig-raiser" thinking!