Good health is everyone's deepest expectation and everyone's foundation. Therefore, whether going to the hospital for physical examination or listening to the advice of local health experts has become two main ways for people to check their health in today's society. But there are often different opinions between the two, which makes it difficult for many people to choose the one that suits them. Therefore, it is feasible for TV stations to hold debates between health experts and clinicians.

I. Feasible reasons for holding a debating competition 1

There used to be a program called "Yangshengtang", which caused many netizens to watch and discuss. After all, staying healthy without spending too much money is what most people desire. However, after the program was broadcast, it was vomited by many doctors. I hope the program group will check the quality of experts and don't mislead the audience casually. This shows that there are many controversial topics between health experts and clinicians, and it can also solve many misunderstandings and contradictions between health experts and clinicians.

Second, the feasibility of holding a debate.

It is related to people's livelihood and people's personal health. Holding this program will certainly attract the attention of many viewers with enough topics and views, and make the program itself feasible. Secondly, holding this debate is also of great benefit to the audience. There is a lot of useful knowledge about health care, but there are also many unproven and inappropriate usages. Holding this debate competition can let people know about healthy and feasible health-keeping methods and scientific clinical research results, and avoid the adverse consequences caused by people's misunderstanding of wrong health-keeping methods because of lack of knowledge.

It is feasible and beneficial to hold this type of debate competition in TV series, but according to Bian Xiao, clinicians can't debate with health experts to a great extent. Because a lot of health knowledge has no scientific basis, which makes clinicians unable to refute. At the same time, clinicians are mostly practical, and their oral ability may not be as good as that of health experts.