I don't agree that Ye Tan is a pseudo-expert. What do you mean, "I have a historical background, but I pretend to be an economist and sociologist by hype and grandstanding?" History has been condensed for a long time from now. Why can't people with historical background pay attention to hot spots, economy and people's livelihood? Who stipulates that a person with a historical background must engage in history all his life, but not learn from the past? In the so-called satisfactory answer, it is said that "in the financial field, domestic netizens are still immature and unprofessional, and more just regard the Internet as a vent, and Ye Tan's article just caters to this vent, and its success also has certain reasons." This statement not only denigrates Ye Tan, but also despises netizens! It is precisely because domestic netizens are immature and unprofessional that Ye Tan needs to learn and understand financial policies with her insight, and spread them enthusiastically to the public to improve their thinking instead of blindly following. She is spreading positive energy. On the hot economic issues, Ye Tan expressed his views with his rigorous attitude and multi-angle thinking, which influenced the economy. Her repeated suggestions on raising the deposit reserve ratio have been adopted by the relevant state departments, and the regulatory effect on China's economy is obvious to all. Otherwise, the current situation of bank capital shortage will be aggravated. I am an ordinary netizen who pays attention to Ye Tan's blog and benefits from it. Among them, she is diligent and has a sense of social responsibility. As soon as hot issues come out, I can see Ye Tan's blog articles immediately, and sometimes she uploads them late at night. It is precisely because our netizens are not financial experts that we need Ye Tan's articles to help us improve. Ye Tan's blog has such a high click rate, which just shows that she is an expert in the hearts of our netizens.