From the perspective of family members, petitioning seems reasonable, but the target is wrong. The pain of losing a loved one must be unbearable, especially when the head of the family leaves and the pillar falls, which will make the life of the family worse. Apart from grief, the only thing they can grasp is some compensation. With everyone gone, at least some money can make life easier. This is also a * * * similarity of most families of the deceased. The sudden death of the rental house requires the landlord's compensation, and the company's high-rise building needs the boss's compensation. No one wants Wang's accident, but his family wants some compensation and is also cleaning it up. However, it is really unreasonable for them to point the finger at the owner. It is more reasonable to find compensation from the property company.
From the owner's point of view, this pot really can't be carried. The owner directly signs a management contract with the owner, but there is an employment relationship between Wang and the owner, and there is no direct labor relationship with the owner. Moreover, according to the on-site evidence, Wang wore slippers when he came up to clean up the stagnant water, and also wore slippers when he was on the mossy roof in rainy days, so he did not have enough safety awareness. The cause of the accident was his own responsibility. Therefore, from the owner's point of view, it really should not be compensated. Originally, the accident in the community made people somewhat taboo, and it was unlucky to lose money.
Life is the biggest, safety is the first. Many things are irreversible at the moment they happen, so we must establish a firm sense of safety in our daily life and work; As the families of the deceased, we should also recognize the nature of the matter while we are sad, instead of clinging and biting at will, but in the end we get nothing.