First of all, I want to explain the meaning of laborer and laborer. Modern Chinese Dictionary explains on page 756: Laborers refer to people who are mainly engaged in mental work, and laborers refer to people who are mainly engaged in manual work. Of course, another debater explained this very well.

Indeed, the appreciation of social wealth and the all-round development of society are jointly created by laborers and laborers, and both are indispensable. So we don't deny the contribution of laborers, but we believe that those who work hard contribute more to society than those who work hard. Next, I will explain our views from three aspects.

First, consciousness has a great reaction, especially the correct consciousness can guide people's practice better. What is modern society? Or in what direction is modern society developing? This is the information society. Information society is a society dominated by knowledge economy. The production process will become more and more automatic, the productive labor will become more and more intelligent, and the contribution of mental labor to society will become more and more prominent. Like Bill Gates, the richest man in the world, he is a typical worker in the information society, and his Microsoft technology is obvious to all. In 200 1 year, he also established the world's largest charitable foundation, with a total amount of $24 billion.

Second, we workers have the most advanced mode of production, which can create more value for society. I believe everyone has heard the saying, "China people eat in two tiers, one is Deng Xiaoping, and the other is Yuan Longping. His hybrid rice will increase rice production by 20% to 20 10, and at least solve the problem of food and clothing for more than one billion people in 10. Isn't this a big contribution?

Third, we workers have rich scientific and cultural knowledge and scientific theory, and have more sensitive innovation ability. "Science and technology are the primary productive forces, and the key to modern international competition is the competition of science and technology." This is not what I said, but what Deng Xiaoping said. In 2005, the State Council promulgated the National Scientific Literacy Action Plan, which clearly pointed out that improving the scientific and cultural quality of the whole people is an important foundation for building an innovative country. It is difficult for a country without innovation ability to stand among the nations of the world. "

So our point of view is that hardworking people make greater contributions to society than laborers! thank you

First of all, I'd like to ask the other debater to pay attention to a few questions:

Another debater said: "Production practice is the most basic practical activity of human beings, and productive labor runs through the whole human society, creating necessary means of production and livelihood for human beings." However, does the foundation have to contribute more? People live to eat and dress, but do people live to eat and dress? Obviously, industrious people organize social resources and manage laborers, creating great material and spiritual wealth and making greater contributions to promoting social development.

Another debater also said: "People are the main body of practice." Please note that people here not only refer to laborers, but also include hard-working people. Although the proportion of workers in this group is very small, their contribution cannot be quantified, and it cannot be said that their contribution is small because of the small proportion of workers.

Another debater also said: "Laborers are the main body of labor." However, hard-working people are also working, and hard-working people use wisdom or higher knowledge to drive workers to realize value. Without the guidance of people with high IQ, what they get from pure labor will be very little or even barren.

The change and development of things are ultimately achieved through qualitative change, and there is no development without qualitative change. If things only stay in the quantitative change stage, it is only the repetition or increase or decrease of homogeneous things, and the fundamental nature of things has not changed, and development will not be realized. Only qualitative change and leap are the fundamental changes of things, so that new things can replace old things. So how to achieve the leap? The key lies in the workers, who pay close attention to things. When the quantitative change reaches a certain level, the workers decisively break through its scope and limit, accumulate small things to promote qualitative change and realize the leap and development of things.

Therefore, we believe that hardworking people make greater contributions to society than laborers.

Anti:

Hello everyone! First of all, thank the school for giving us this opportunity to have a debate.

The pages of history have opened a corner of today's era. We built densely populated towns on once barren land. We found treasure in the seemingly unfathomable ocean, and we left footprints in the high sky. All this is the result of the interaction between laborers and laborers. From ancient times to the present, I think the answer should be more clear in today's era, that is, workers contribute more.

First of all, I want to summarize the mistakes made by other debaters.

First, the other debater emphasized that workers are the main body engaged in production practice. However, the opposing debater should pay attention not to look at the problem from the perspective of quantity.

Second, the opposing party has repeatedly said that workers play the role of foundation, but the foundation is not necessarily the most important. We have already explained this point.

Laborers play a great role, but those who work hard play a greater role.

First, consciousness has a great dynamic role. The spirit of thinking is the most beautiful flower in the world. These flowers are surrounded by worker ants, and the history of mankind is written in the fragrance and delicacy of these flowers.

Second, the development of everything is the result of both quantitative change and qualitative change. Quantitative change is the foundation, qualitative change is the key and the most important. It is the workers who have contributed to these qualitative changes. The history of scientific and technological revolution and the history of reform wave have proved this point.

Third, the era of knowledge economy has arrived, and science and technology have become the primary productive force. We workers represent the most advanced mode of production, master the most advanced science and technology, are the most revolutionary forces, and naturally make great contributions to social development.

Now, in the 2 1 century, China has implemented the strategy of "rejuvenating the country through science and education" and "strengthening the country through talents", and I believe that the development of China will take a new step.

Look! Ahead is a road full of flowers and sunshine. Wisdom is our guide and knowledge is our star. That road will get wider and wider and brighter!

From two extremes. First, the primitive human society, which is the most lacking in material, made the greatest contribution to society by hunting for the material source of life. At the other extreme, when the social form is in a highly developed era, it is certain that all manual labor can be basically realized by machinery, and this is the development trend of society. The past history has confirmed this point, and the future technology can also make us clearly see this point, especially the development of nanotechnology will greatly accelerate this process; Then in this social form, we all know that the contribution of mental labor will be greater than that of manual labor, and it will be an era of pursuing and advocating technological innovation, and the contribution of creation will be greater than that of manufacturing. It can be concluded that all social forms of human beings are between these two extremes, so the contribution of manual labor and mental labor is also in the process of constant balance. From the perspective of human history, this balance is a constant trend and mental work, but it does not rule out that there will be a rebound in a specific period, but there is an interval between those two extremes.

From a historical macro point of view, there is no need for discussion. The contribution of mental labor is definitely greater than that of manual labor. What drives social development is productivity. What is the driving force of productivity? It's technology Where did they come from? Newton has a saying that it comes from the brain power accumulated by human beings from generation to generation. He said that he could only achieve success by standing on the shoulders of giants. So who are these giants, maybe Galileo, maybe Copernicus, maybe the nostalgia of ancient Greece, those unsung heroes? In fact, those geometric equations in mathematics, such as the calculation of geometric shapes such as ellipses, are based on a set of systems they have established and then expanded. Galileo, Copernicus, Newton and others all benefited from their predecessors' understanding of the universe and calculation of the movement of celestial bodies. But those theories didn't make any contribution at all in the social form of ancient Greece, they were just brain games, but the achievements many years later greatly promoted the development process of mankind! Therefore, from a historical point of view, there is no doubt that the contribution of mental labor is greater than that of manual labor.

If we want to discuss it in terms of our current social form, then, based on my understanding, I think that the contribution of brain power is greater than that of manual labor, which can be confirmed in many ways. This conclusion can be obtained from the distribution characteristics of social individual wages and benefits and from the government's policy system. But it can't be said that manual labor is not important and should not be discriminated against!