A girl in her twenties has a good figure, a fat ass, a big chest and a cheerful personality.
She just danced on the subway and was about to be arrested.
I think this is ridiculous.
From the video, the girl's figure is fat but not greasy, her legs are strong, her hips are muscular and her crotch is neat and standard.
The whole set of dance moves is relatively skilled, obviously practiced many times at home.
The expression is in place, coquettish and unpretentious.
I think it is aesthetic to use poles on the subway as dance props to promote the art of pole dancing to the public. ?
First, the woman is tall, with relatively balanced speed, strength and skills. Combining the masculine beauty of men with the feminine beauty of women, with a white exterior and a bunny hood, it shows contemporary China.
Women are elegant, sexy, bold and fashionable.
Personally, I don't support the view that some people reflect the indecent dress of women.
I think it is understandable to wear special clothes at special events, just like wearing a swimsuit in a swimsuit competition.
Second, so girls are dancing pole dancing, and there is no clear stipulation that pole dancing is not allowed on the subway. Today in the 2 1 century, we should not look at these arts with colored glasses.
Many stars, including Madonna, Angelina Jolie, Joey Yung and Karen Mok, are admirers of pole dancing.
Of course, this girl is not wearing a mask.
During the epidemic prevention and control, I think there are certain safety problems, and subway staff should remind them. ?
It seems a bit "frozen" or even "out of line" to detain a girl without a mask in a video.
I especially remember that Yang Yanxia, a criminal law teacher, once said:
Even if the girl is still on the subway, you can't drag her to the ground and drag her out of the car. Some girls wear yoga pants, which are tight and tight, and their bodies are completely exposed. So, is yoga pants more excessive or is this underwear more excessive?
Excessive.
Besides, according to Article 10 of the Shanghai Rail Transit Passenger Code: barefoot, shirtless, greasy and drunk,
Patients with serious infectious diseases, unsupervised mental patients or people whose health status endangers the safety of others are not allowed to enter the station. ?
3. Do you see it? Didn't you say that people wearing underwear are not allowed to enter the station? It means that people with greasy clothes are not allowed to enter the station.
So my friend, when you come home from the construction site and your clothes are dirty, what should you do?
Take it off, of course, you can't wear greasy clothes, just bras and underwear!
So girls' dress is completely understandable, so I still want to say what I said when I faced candy-colored tights in the gym.
Words:
Support every fitness woman to wear tight clothes, protect the legitimate rights and interests of every woman to take selfies, and create a better fitness circle for them.
In order to provide better public opinion support for every bunny to dance pole dancing and promote the positive energy of society, we have been on the road.
The subway car in this incident is an obvious public place. What kind of behavior is disturbing the order of public places.
Disruptive behavior generally includes the following types: deliberately violating the rules of public behavior in public places and gathering people to make trouble; Illegal procession or
Sit-in demonstrations, causing traffic jams and disorder; Stop and resist relevant staff to maintain order in public places. ?
Fourth, the number of participants in the subway posing activities is large, the division of labor is clear, and the organizers, photographers and performers are obviously beyond the public.
Moral bottom line behavior. Although shooting in underwear, the clothes are weird and the movements are vulgar, which obviously violates social norms.
Yes
Finally, this vulgar behavior actually has no aesthetic feeling. If there are children around to see it, it should be aggravated.
The circumstances of punishment. If you show off like this, you will definitely be detained by the police according to law.
But from the marketing point of view, people's teams should have made a pre-judgment before they started to act, and even figured out if they could attract widespread attention.
They are very happy about the controversial heat wave, and even the negative news is well known, which shows that their marketing purpose has been
It worked.
There has always been a saying in the advertising industry that even negative news is better than sinking into the sea, so sometimes being out of position is deliberate.
Because.
Fifth, so in the early framework, controversial advertisements or controversial marketing behaviors were generally planned, and a few were unplanned. Unplanned controversial advertisements, marketing behaviors and controversial design images are regarded as advertisements if they do not cause widespread controversy.
The failure of marketing subject.
Generally speaking, advertising media is the display space paid by advertisers (including billboards, window, web page display space and patch advertising space).
Wait a minute. ), but the media of controversial advertisements mainly lies in the scope of controversy it causes, so it can far exceed its display position.
Moreover, it can produce a significantly higher effect than uncontroversial advertising in attracting the attention of display users, so it is generally considered that being detained is dirty.
Yes, but it's wrong. Marketing teams are usually not afraid of being notorious, and even feel glad that they have paid more attention. Let's raise our glasses!
Let me show you a comment in the advertising knowledge system: if controversial advertisements are combined with indecent/disgusting images, they can also produce shocking advertising effects.
As a result, surprisingly, this kind of advertisement not only attracts people's attention, produces more lasting memories, but also accumulates people's consumption behavior.
The role of the pole
Sixth, with this provision, there is also the "Rail Transit Passenger Code" formulated by the Shanghai Traffic Administrative Department to restrain passengers. Obviously, people who wear underwear and their peers must abide by this code when they buy tickets as passengers. this is not me
I said it myself. This is stipulated in article 2 of the law. Passengers entering the station shall not affect operational safety and interfere with other passengers.
This is not what I said myself, but what I said in Article 9 (17) of this Code. ?
According to the provisions of Article 15 of this Code, only when passengers violate the code and the subway operation enterprise stops it, can they report to the public security organ for handling. news
It does not mean that the subway operator has stopped it, which is actually more critical. If the subway operator doesn't stop passengers from wearing only inside.
Taking photos with clothes on may be considered as the default permission of passengers to do so. In this case, the public security organs participated in the handling to some extent.
Mind your own business.