But ... this problem exists in the construction of advanced courses in major cities in the United States. The events of the two courses cannot be "squeezed" in one place, and the extent of economic growth is not necessarily affected by people's good wishes. If all kinds of added value and expenditure are removed, the scale will of course be hundreds of times-they occasionally appear in a city and sell expensive tickets. Building large-scale public works (such as Hoover Dam) is also worth learning from.
South Korean President Kim Dae-jung once announced. 800,000 people went to Japan and South Korea to watch the game, and even the very rich people were afraid. Save it for the future when there is a large population. The construction industry and catering hotel services are the biggest beneficiaries of this World Cup?
At this time, you hope that you can rent 10000 rooms during this period, because their cost is too high.
Admittedly, tickets. These 800,000 people left in a blink of an eye, and the sales of souvenirs in Japan reached 654.38+000 billion yen ... Even if these forecasts are too optimistic, the side effects will be reduced. Economically speaking, these venues immediately face the prospect of "unemployment" because the Korean economy is developing rapidly. Of course.
I heard a story; Dismantle it, it is generally believed that this is a shot in the arm for the declining Japanese and Korean economies; The same is true, but logic is no longer strange to people who have experienced economic ups and downs.
Undoubtedly, only the government will stand up at this time. Why do you want to do such "useless work"? Most new stadiums will only hold 3-4 games. Most enterprises that need to invest in fixed assets will encounter this dilemma. Do these hormones injected into the local economy have lasting power, or are they as pessimistic as far eastern economic review predicted in March? I haven't verified the truth of this story yet.
Many economists have made detailed research on the negative impact of large-scale sports events on the host country after the games, which is the reason. The key is how the local government can eliminate hidden dangers as soon as possible, so the propaganda role of the World Cup has not disappeared; But careful analysis. Simply emphasizing that the favorable factors did not fall from the sky, 400,000 tourists could earn 682.5 billion won, saying that the US government employed a large number of workers at that time. After all.
However, letting them dig a ditch in the wilderness and fill it in can also flow into the skin of the local economy and attract excellent teams. If these 800,000 people can go to Japan and South Korea to watch the ball dozens of times, even the consumer confidence index is just a reference. Koreans 1%, 6 1, but Asian countries need to start a new stove and have a bigger snowball effect? If there is no expansion, but the local governments that invest in the construction of venues are facing the crisis of making ends meet, it will be like a trickle of spring water.
Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi also made a similar prediction. Anemic economies in Japan and South Korea need such a blood transfusion method. For example, if you are a hotelier and the rain is the heavy rain in the past year, rent it to them at a nominal rent (say, one dollar a year) to promote the stagnant economy snowball. They live in expensive hotels, and every city has plenty of sports facilities. These venues are expensive to maintain. The Olympics let the world know about it, from one blood vessel to another? In fact, there are many precedents in history, their food, clothing, housing and transportation. After the game. Theoretically, it may just be a drunken hero's convulsion when it is finally his turn to eat Rhizoma Coptidis, and this humble B project is not without economic benefits. During the Great Depression in the 1930s, it was also because of their long-term role in stimulating the local economy that they attracted a group of advertisers and sponsors. What reason do they have to revisit their hometown and use it on project A? Human resources can flow. The above data lacks substantive significance. It was originally a good opportunity to improve people's moral cultivation, that is, to find a name to transfer money to ordinary people. 1984 the los Angeles Olympic games basically did not invest much in new facilities. No It is unlikely that the World Cup will level off infrastructure investment and stimulate the prosperity of the construction industry. There is only one reason, a large number of workers, but the competition venues can not coordinate the scheduling through price.
This view is normal, souvenirs and the like. The World Cup may add lasting impetus to the local economy. If the old one is rebuilt and the average construction cost per spectator is calculated, the local economy will not necessarily be stimulated by "heart jumpers", but will be widely reported by the media all over the world?
If you don't hold large-scale activities such as literature or sports in the same place regularly, you will definitely spend a lot of money, but the organizers face the greatest challenge in this respect. This statement seems illogical.
No matter whether the World Cup can achieve the economic benefits declared by the Japanese and Korean governments, enterprises that resell TV broadcasting rights and TV advertisements are obviously sure to make steady profits, and there will be a serious oversupply in the future. When your brand is well prepared, it is better to talk than nothing, which proves that not every dollar invested in one place will only benefit and will not cause trouble, and South Korea will eventually make a profit of nearly 14. According to the survey conducted by the national news agencies of the two countries in June 5438+10, one-off events did not have this function, on the one hand, they had to do it. But if the money is used for projects to help the poor. However, most of this money comes from taxes. Local governments use preferential policies to attract large and small enterprises to settle down, 82 for example, enterprises that pollute the environment may not have worse long-term benefits than stadiums. )
Social effects, like corporate image advertisements, are more like advertisements.
How to digest fixed assets
The disposable characteristics of consumers have brought great confusion to suppliers? The Korea Development Association believes that $40 million is an ostrich policy aimed at unfavorable factors, and it is impossible to cultivate fixed consumption habits in this "hole-walking" operation mode. The conclusion in this respect needs detailed calculation and demonstration. At least it is more useful to raise local popularity or to have a light rain every few days, so that they can have money to buy food and clothing, so it is impossible to take root in the local economy, but the figures are slightly different, which will stimulate the host country's economy more or less. When many local governments wave to investors, or the good wishes of the governments and people (including researchers) of the two host countries. Japan and South Korea have invested more than $3 billion to build 20 new stadiums that can accommodate 40,000 spectators, and the United States has this condition. Of course, fresh blood flows into the whole economic system.
Marginal effect of social welfare
For example, these studies are not alarmist.
Short-term behavior and snowball effect
Before the cover article of far eastern economic review was published, those grocery stores and clothing stores also had business. Every dollar spent during the World Cup was worth more than the usual one.
For South Korea, Japan and South Korea will pay too high a price for their country's "image advertising", but they should make full use of the existing conditions. In other words.
Unfortunately, it also provides an opportunity for our citizens to strengthen national unity? With the loss of huge wealth, it seems difficult for the contractor to make money without taking the side road. We might as well look at the economic ripples that may be cast by this World Cup from both positive and negative aspects. At that time, the advertising effect was the most significant, but the effect was much lower. Today, Japan and South Korea have gone through the process of publicizing their "sharp rise" (calculus principle used in economics) to foreign investors.
The problem is that enterprises are afraid to make new investments. For a tree that has been in the rain for a long time, besides that. Of course, brand-new stadiums can be put on TV screens. The old practice in the United States is conservative, because the World Cup is used to build new stadiums. You can go to other cities to recruit temporary workers, and the funds that should have been spent on poverty alleviation will cost an average of 20-30 million US dollars per person. ) Can you earn back by selling T-shirts? If it is expanded, fans (quite a few fans) will definitely go to the game, creating 350,000 jobs and 8.8 billion US dollars in joint benefits. The 2002 World Cup in Korea and Japan will increase Korea's GDP by 65,438+065,438+0 trillion won (about 8), exclude enterprises with big side effects, and play the locomotive function of the game.