The cost of private education purchased by the woman is nearly 20 thousand yuan. However, the course ended and the original coach left. This woman was replaced by a new fitness instructor. After several classes, the woman felt that the new coach was of average level and there were few coaches in the gym, so the course was full and it was difficult for her to make an appointment. Because the experience is getting worse and worse, neither the woman nor I want to continue exercising in this gym. The woman has several courses left, and the price of these courses is about 3000 yuan.
When the woman asked to leave the gym, she was told that if she canceled the contract, she would have to pay a handling fee of more than 5,000 yuan. The total refund is only 3,000 yuan, but she has to pay a handling fee of 5,000 yuan. In the end, she lost more than 2000 yuan. Of course, women will not accept the gym treaty. After this incident was exposed, many professional lawyers studied the treaty signed between this gym and consumers. After careful study, it is found that many treaties in gymnasiums are standard clauses, which completely shirk responsibility and harm consumers' rights and interests.
The professional legal person thinks that the woman's previous private education has left, so the woman has the right to refuse to continue to perform the contract and ask for a refund. The overlord clause signed by this gym with consumers is really unacceptable. After the exposure, I believe that the reputation of this gym will also decline.