Composition writing has always been a "stumbling block" for candidates to get high marks in the application examination. We come to the conclusion that many candidates are not very troubled by the topic, structure, setting of the beginning of the composition, or the structure of the sub-argument, except the argument after the sub-argument. In the past, most candidates chose to copy materials to solve this problem, but the results were extremely disappointing. In fact, there are still many argumentation methods that can help candidates complete the content filling. Below, we will lead you to learn an "advanced" argument method-the analysis of famous sayings and aphorisms.
The so-called famous aphorism analysis method, as its name implies, is to introduce famous aphorisms (including ancient poems, leaders' speeches or opinions of experts and scholars) into the argument part, and then improve the theoretical height and writing authority of the essay argument part through the introduction of famous aphorisms, so that our composition can attract more examiners and win their favor. Specifically, then, the writing idea of famous aphorism analysis should emphasize: "argument+famous aphorism+aphorism explanation (enlightenment)+material case filling+rebate argument". Here is an example to elaborate and explain it in detail, so as to facilitate candidates to learn and understand better.
Building a country ruled by law needs to improve people's legal awareness and cultivate people's legal literacy. Rousseau, a famous French scholar, emphasized in On Social Contract: "The most important law in all laws is not engraved on bronze bells or marble, but in people's hearts." This sentence warns us that to build a country ruled by law, we must have a certain number of people with legal awareness and legal literacy as the foundation. XXXXX material case "media trial". Therefore, we need to actively improve people's legal awareness and cultivate people's legal literacy in order to effectively build a country ruled by law. (Therefore, it is necessary to intensify legal publicity for the people, realize the coverage and popularization of legal publicity through legal lecture halls, laws entering the campus and communities, effectively improve people's legal awareness and cultivate legal literacy. )
The analysis of famous aphorisms is "high-end" and is easily favored by examiners. However, candidates need to actively collect and recite relevant famous sayings and aphorisms after class, so as to accumulate more knowledge and avoid the problem of "copying" materials in the exam. We hope that candidates can learn and absorb better and make their articles achieve more excellent results.
2. 20 15 national civil service examination preparation: argument selection of argumentative papers;
The facts and reasons used to prove an argument are called arguments. According to the nature and characteristics of debate itself, debate can be divided into factual debate and rational debate (also called rational debate).
I. Basic requirements
1. The argument should be true.
Truth is to conform to reality and the logic of life. Only when the argument is conclusive and reliable can the argument be fully and forcefully proved and made irrefutable.
Arguments contain many points, for example, factual arguments generally include time, place, people, process, reason, result, quantity and other points. If one of the viewpoints is wrong, it will make people laugh, expose the false defects of the argument, and let the discussion building that they have painstakingly built collapse.
It is also feasible to use fables as arguments. Although fable is fictional, its implication conforms to the logic of life and can reveal the truth in life. In the same way, examples from famous books are also acceptable, but they should be used with caution. Pay attention to avoid inaccurate argumentation caused by misunderstanding of literary works.
2. The argument should be accurate
Accuracy means that the argument should be linked with the argument and can prove the argument. If it has nothing to do with the argument, no matter how vivid it is, you can't choose it. When choosing arguments, we should pay attention to the fact that the specific materials used as arguments are often multifaceted. If we analyze them from different angles, we can find different meanings. So an argument can often explain many reasons at the same time. Therefore, we should pay attention to the needs of the argument, pay attention to the flexible tailoring of the argument, and make the argument adapt to the argument.
3. The argument should be typical.
It means that argument should reveal the essence and law of things, be representative and be inevitable. Candidates must choose the most typical and representative materials when answering the composition, rather than accidental individual phenomena.
Typical materials have great ideological capacity, which is the most telling and meaningful. It is not necessarily the main theme, and it is not necessarily fully formed; It can be obtained through processing and refining, or it can choose a typical argument and cut it into several pieces to serve the argument.
The selection of materials should be typical. When using theoretical arguments and factual arguments, candidates should "choose admiration", that is, choose famous sayings and examples. The remarks of unidentified people such as "some people say" and "some people say" are often "people talk lightly" and lack weight.
4. The arguments should be rich.
This article is not mandatory. An argumentative essay should be persuasive and rich in arguments. Simple quantity is not necessarily rich, but may only give people a sense of piling up. Choosing materials from different fields and different angles is rich in arguments. Give you a simple and clear four-word formula: ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign.
5. The argument should be novel.
Try to choose novel arguments, so that the article can be vivid and attractive. The so-called novelty can be unprecedented material, or it can be material that has existed before, but is understood from a new perspective. When choosing arguments, candidates can write articles with highlights if they can innovate old materials. To be "new", we should pay more attention to the things around us and accumulate hot events that have happened recently; Or reuse old materials from a new angle.
Second, how to extract arguments from materials.
Candidates should be good at using materials skillfully. "Qiao" here mainly refers to finding the right angle of using materials and determining the priorities, details and emotional color of materials. No matter how good an argument is, if it is not used properly, it can't play its role in expressing the theme. The same argument often has different sides and can explain different problems. When using it, we must pay attention to finding the angle consistent with the center, and link the argument with the argument to make it closely linked. Candidates should learn to process materials as necessary. According to the need of expressing the central argument, we can transform complex materials into simple materials, or expand simple materials into complex materials, transform scattered materials into complete materials, and transform materials different from the center into materials completely consistent with the center. However, it should be noted that when writing a composition, the narrative of the material must be concise and to the point, and it should not be cumbersome.