But it was recorded in a rhythm similar to MJ's classic album BillieJean. Netizens compared the accompaniment of these two songs and found that they were not only similar. Exactly the same. There are also many netizens echoing in the comment area. No wonder it sounds so familiar. It turned out to be stealing. It is not good to copy others. If you have to copy it, it's hard not to be found. Some fans painted him, saying that the song was originally adapted from the stage and could not be said to be stolen. After the dispute, I responded to the Wang incident. This is consistent with what fans say. In response, I said the same thing, saying that it was not stealing, but that the song was originally retro. After a long discussion, can you explain it to the "saluter"?
Obviously, this statement cannot be accepted by all listeners. More importantly, if it is a tribute, why not say it? If I haven't said it before, that's good. Why not write MJ's name when composing and arranging music? I didn't admit it until I was found. That doesn't mean I didn't see the coffin and didn't cry. Netizens gave him a good evaluation: the whiter you wash, the faster you fall. Because it has been clarified, Wang did not mention the copyright issue in the whole process. No matter whether he pays tribute or steals, he will at least clarify the problem, instead of discussing or talking about the most important things. Some fans continued to explain to him that copyright involves commercial issues. Now that we have discussed the copyright issue,
Then let's talk about what copyright is. Copyright is the right enjoyed by creators, including the following contents: publishing works in their own name, pen name or unsigned form; Protect the integrity of the work; Revise published works; Make a statement to withdraw the published work due to the change of viewpoint or other legitimate reasons, but give appropriate compensation to the publishing unit; Use the work in the form of publication, reproduction, broadcasting, performance, exhibition, shooting, translation or adaptation through legal channels; Obtain economic remuneration for others to use the work. If the above rights are infringed, the author or other copyright owner has the right to demand that the infringement be stopped and compensate for the losses. Finally, the copyright owner has the right to demand that the infringement be stopped.
And compensate others for the losses caused by the economic remuneration obtained by using the work. Wang is obviously using other people's works, so did he get any financial reward? Needless to say this question! Not only Wang, but also the program host is suspected of infringement. In a few words, many famous online singers and popular online celebrity songs have been stolen in recent years. This is no longer someone's problem. The rise of short films will indeed breed many grassroots stars, but how many people want to become popular in any way? I believe everyone knows this. What is even more frightening is that some parties usually remain silent about the needs of market competition. This is both helpless and worrying.