Aunt Chen, a sanitation worker, was abused by her aunt who was doing sit-ups on the fitness equipment next to her when she was cleaning. She scolded Aunt Chen for affecting exercise. Other citizens quickly dissuaded, and Aunt Chen didn't talk back. She also swept up the last leaf under the fitness equipment with a broom. This completely angered the aunt. She grabbed the broom from Aunt Chen's hand, trampled it off with her foot, and knocked it hard on Aunt Chen's hands and feet. Aunt Chen saw the situation and ran away. Aunt Chen was stopped by other citizens when she was chasing, but she actually called 1 10 to report that "migrant workers beat people". Unbearable citizens surrounded her and waited for the police to testify. Under the persuasion of the police and witnesses, the aunt admitted her mistake and gave Aunt Chen 3000 yuan in compensation. After the incident was exposed by the media, it attracted the attention of the society. Some people praised Aunt Chen, some people praised the witnesses, and some people exaggerated Mom.

Who do you prefer to praise for the above three types of people? Please combine the content and meaning of the materials to reflect your thoughts and choices.

It is required to choose a good angle, define the concept, clarify the style and draw up a good title; Don't copy, don't copy.

Material interpretation

This is a typical task-driven material synthesis. You can follow the following four steps to examine questions and write.

The first step is to refine the composition requirements and clarify the writing tasks. When writing a composition with task-driven materials, candidates should read the materials carefully, read the topic requirements carefully and complete the writing task. The task of this material focuses on "who do you like in the above three types of people?" Please synthesize the content and meaning of the materials and reflect your thoughts and choices. " In this sentence. This sentence focuses on the task requirements set by the proponent. After careful analysis, there should be the following tasks:

1, "Who do you prefer to praise for the three types of people?" The writing object, the main body of the statement and the stylistic requirements are defined. When writing, choose one of the three types of people (Aunt Chen, Witness and Aunt) and do it from the perspective of "I" praise. At the same time, the word "like" restricts candidates' writing from the perspective of style and writing ideas. First, write an argumentative essay. Second, praise is praise. "Who do you like?" Ask to set up sub-arguments around the reasons for praise and start writing.

2 "Please synthesize the content and significance of the materials". This is actually reflected in the requirements of writing argumentation, which should be demonstrated around this material.

3 "Reflect your thinking and choice". This is actually another requirement for the demonstration, that is, why should we praise "this" instead of "that", and the demonstration should have proper contrast.

The second step is to analyze the content of the material and make clear the right and wrong. This material has so many levels of content. First, Aunt Chen, who swept the floor, was abused, beaten and complained that "migrant workers beat people" by an aunt who was exercising. Second, the citizens stopped, and then surrounded the aunt who chased Aunt Chen to testify to the police. Third, an aunt who was exercising insulted, beat and complained that Aunt Chen was "beaten by migrant workers". Later, under the persuasion of the police and witnesses, Aunt Chen admitted her mistake and gave Aunt Chen 3,000 yuan in compensation. Fourth, after this incident was exposed by the media, it attracted the attention of the society. Some people praised Aunt Chen, some people praised the witnesses, and some people exaggerated Mom.

This material involves many parties, but as long as it is written around three types of people, that is, aunt Chen, witness and aunt. Grasp the core facts of the first, second and third layers of materials and analyze right and wrong.

1. From Aunt Chen's point of view. Sweeping the floor is Aunt Chen's job. Even when Aunt Chen abused her, she still swept the last leaf clean, which shows that she loves her job and is loyal to her duties. Aunt Chen ignored her aunt's insults, scolded her back, and fled according to the situation, which reflected her high literacy and forbearance spirit.

2. From the point of view of witnessing citizens. The citizens quickly dissuaded, stopped, surrounded, abused, beaten, falsely accused and chased Aunt Chen, which showed that they dared to uphold justice and give positive energy to society.

3. From aunt's point of view. She abused, beat and complained that Aunt Chen's "migrant workers beat people" was wrong and a sign of low civilization. "Later, under the persuasion of the police and witnesses, the aunt admitted the mistake and gave Aunt Chen 3,000 yuan in compensation." This is commendable. You can be sure that when you know your mistake, you will correct it. In short, we should analyze the reasons for praise.

The third step is to choose a good angle and determine the point of view of the article according to right or wrong. The so-called "choosing a good angle" is to conceive from a core angle and an important angle. This material should be written from three core angles or important angles: aunt Chen, witness and aunt. When writing, you can set arguments around right and wrong. But as far as this material is concerned, the argument should revolve around "yes". In turn, you can set the argument like this: to praise Aunt Chen, you can start with her serious and forbearing character; In order to witness the praise of citizens, we can write from their courage to uphold justice and give positive energy to society. If you like aunt, you can write from the aspect of correcting her mistakes. The viewpoint established in this way is accurate and comprehensive, which meets the examination requirements of the material composition for students.

The fourth step is to reason on the basis of materials and make good use of analogy. In the past, materials always played the role of eliciting opinions, but after eliciting opinions, they were useless. Task-driven materials should not only produce opinions, but also "analyze materials and reason from facts" throughout the whole text in specific writing, which is the remarkable feature of task-driven materials.

As far as this material is concerned, when writing, we should put forward our own views and demonstrate them closely around a material, and explain our views to readers reasonably in combination with the material. For example, write praise for Aunt Chen, closely link the materials with social reality, and state the reasons for praise, that is, the advantages of hard work and forbearance. , through the phenomenon into the essence, the point of view should be enlightening and can be promoted layer by layer in the structure. You can also contact similar materials for analogy and analysis, and analyze the core values such as emotion, reason and law behind the incident. It is worth noting that students' improper analogy in writing weakens their persuasiveness and their arguments. The so-called analogy here means that the behaviors of related parties in the same material are essentially the same or opposite. When writing, you should reason around "the same or the opposite" and finally come down to the point you express.