Muscle is now one of the criteria for women to measure men. If a person has strong muscles, what a thing to show off. It can not only win the favor of women, but also enhance their self-confidence. But does more muscle mean more strength? For example, male bodybuilders or those fighters, who has greater muscle strength?

The bigger the muscle, the greater the strength. Athletes in bodybuilding competitions will intentionally increase muscle fullness and make muscles more ornamental, which will give them an advantage in the competition. Like those boxers, although their muscles are not big, they are very explosive and powerful.

If the mobilization of bodybuilders and boxers is far greater than strength, it is obvious that bodybuilders have bigger muscles, but bodybuilders may not win. Because of long-term physical training, boxers' muscles are not big and too tired, which is not conducive to muscle growth. Moreover, bodybuilders do aerobic training during exercise, which is beneficial to muscle growth. But the boxer's muscles are more powerful.

Muscles and muscles are different. The muscles of bodybuilders are only ornamental, while the fighting muscles are explosive, powerful, coordinated and agile. The shape of muscle does not represent the function of muscle. As the saying goes, you can't have your cake and eat it. If you want a good muscle shape, you need to lose coordination and endurance. If you want coordination and endurance, you need to lose weight, so we can't judge a thing just by its appearance.