The quality is reduced. Now the director's career is not good, so it is natural that famous actors should take the blame. Zhao Benshan was also a sensation. Classic lines in the hands of the torch: outstanding 2008. We are 80 years old and caught up. It is also a sketch of daily tasks, and Uncle Benshan did a good job. Zhao Benshan also criticized. "What are you a celebrity in the clouds? That's my name. I'm just an old woman in the country. What book should I write if I don't graduate from primary and secondary schools? I have been at home for seven days, and I already have six words. " The emotion of others can be sensational to the extreme, and two sentences can make the mentality timely. What are you doing?
Criticism can make the meaning of education ridiculous, which is a skill. Obviously, the famous actors nowadays don't have this overall strength. In addition, the Internet is relatively developed, and every sentence needs to be cautious. My mistake makes you uncomfortable, that is, your sentence may indeed cause unnecessary inconvenience on the Internet. Or "torchbearer", "What is the distressing fitness exercise?" "Football team." "What is more painful exercise than the football team?" "Chinese national football team." All right, wait for the keyboard man's air raid. It is said that some players with poor body shape will cause opposite spraying. Do you think most of this sentence is equivalent to death? It was Shen Teng's essay "Rejecting pornography, gambling and table tennis". Naturally, Shen Teng's essay made a mistake, but it still caused a great sensation at that time.
Why are there so many sketches praising sensitive atmosphere, especially CCTV Spring Festival Evening? I think there is another reason besides the necessity of promoting positive energy: the sensitivity of the audience has been significantly enhanced. Let's talk about a situation first: Mahua FunAge's team has an essay entitled "Do whatever you want", and there is a classic line "Refuse to gamble and refuse to play table tennis", which was reported by the Table Tennis Association. In the eyes of others, it is funny and humorous, but it can touch some people's nervous system. Moreover, the sketch only talks about things and does not ruin the sports competition of table tennis. So, if there is any variety show that satirizes others and talks about others, what else will it be?
Imagine: suppose I am in charge, how can I offend less inconvenience? Then simply make all the sketches of zzzq and praise them. Although the user evaluation will decline, at least it will not touch everyone's nerves, so no one will report it and there will be no "not very good" social impact. Before the Table Tennis Association reported it, many people probably didn't expect that the classic line of "rejecting table tennis" would offend them. Similarly, when you watch more Coca-Cola sketches, you may not imagine that a few classic lines will inadvertently touch the nervous system of some viewers before Internet technology blows up Finland.
After all, there are many examples of human emotions not communicating with each other in recent years, or that "the foothold was originally' good', but it has been accidentally poked at the pain points of some viewers". In fact, I can't get an erection (they don't mean it! Frankly speaking, I think disassembly seems to be a controversial topic, so I won't talk about it.
If you organize the sketches of the older generation in Peisi Chen, you will find a difficult problem. Their main push is cross-service chat. Peisi Chen's leading role and supporting role, prince and postman, policeman and thief. The name is clearly written, that is, two people with real identities have different structures for the same thing, and they collide with each other to tell jokes. For example, in the leading role and supporting role, the leading role wants to pursue the quality of the perfect drama, and the walk-on wants a lot of main plays. Then they put it there, and immediately a sense of humor came. On the other hand, Zhao promoted the discussion on this topic. She is not advocating two true identities, but just two core concepts in daily life, a right way and a wrong way.
There is an old woman who wants to get things done quickly and buy tofu, and there is also a news report director who wants the actual effect of variety shows. In "So Packaged", the famous actors in the play collided with pop songs (by the way, help rapper watch the rap sung by an illiterate old woman in the 1990s, and then look at everyone's rap). The Adventure of Working is a collision between a female worker who wants to open a restaurant safely and an unscrupulous boss who wants to sell services to cheat money. Zhao Benshan is another structure. That is to say, the two sides of cross-service chat no longer meet by chance, but just collide actively. And their differences are not irreconcilable, but there are differences in information between them.
Simply put, the active party leads each other by the nose in various ways. This is mostly an all-powerful template. It would be funny if we could get rid of the baggage. This series of products such as People on the Road and Detective Chinatown are just so much. But there is a problem with this template, that is, it must be scattered in the end. You thought about the differences and contradictions in the whole episode, but they didn't break out in the end ... what do you want to do? This is why although Huang Hong's business level is not inferior to that of Zhao Benshan, he is always defeated by Zhao Benshan. It is also the reason why Zhao Benshan's essays in the middle and late period are not very funny. For example, in "Not Bad Money", if Peisi Chen or Zhao finally finds it, it's time to bow down and bow down, and Zhao Benshan has to continue to have a high number of goose eggs. This will blow the contradiction of the short story to a half.