It is foolish to underestimate the difficulty of a thing because I haven't tried it. Many people always think that the reason why I don't go to fitness is because I don't have time or need it, but I often ignore whether I can persist or whether I will have a good fitness effect after fitness. Ignoring these often leads to giving up fitness halfway. Similarly, some people often overestimate the difficulty of fitness training and even doubt whether they can stick to the beginning.

But the truth is, don't say three years If you have money and time, 1 year can turn you into a muscular man. Now fitness is becoming more and more scientific and standardized, which leads to higher fitness efficiency. On the other hand, those soldiers who have high physical training every day may not become muscular men even after serving for five years. Then the muscular man who worked for three years and the veteran who served for five years,

First, the gap between muscle shape and muscle strength.

Like some bodybuilders who are willing to spend money, they can build a very good figure in just a few months, not to mention three years of fitness. Even ordinary people without any fitness experience can build a muscular man's figure through three years of fitness. Fitness is really not difficult. The hard part is how you can persist.

A muscular man who has been working out for 3 years has a relatively tall figure, and his overall muscles are more aesthetic and ornamental. After all, muscle training is always where it is, and veterans who have served for five years, even if they do physical training every day, rarely can build a strong muscle. Of course, except for some special arms, the difference in appearance between the two muscles is the most obvious. There is also a great difference in muscle strength between the two. The muscles developed by bodybuilders are definitely stronger. Many bodybuilders can bench press dozens or hundreds of kilograms, but if an old hand tries, they may not be able to push any of them. Of course, a veteran can do a lot of pull-ups, but many bodybuilders can't. It can be said that this is the difference in muscle expression.

Second, the gap between their health.

A person's health is bound to be related to his daily diet, work and rest. Even an ordinary person, as long as he can do these two things, believes that his body will be fine. Fitness people believe that he is one of the people who pay most attention to diet and rest. After all, if you want to have a good fitness effect, diet and rest are indispensable, and the soldiers in the army, although the food situation in the army has improved better in recent years, believe that no veteran can combine work and rest.

Third, the gap in muscle flexibility.

In terms of muscle flexibility, the muscle man who has been trained is naturally not as good as the veteran who has served for 5 years. Compared with fitness, it only increases muscles, which have more strength and dimension. In terms of how to exercise muscles, bodybuilders may all be white, while veterans' daily physical training is mainly unarmed training to improve muscle coordination. Therefore, in terms of muscle flexibility, muscle men who exercise and keep fit are not as good as veterans.

Which do you think is better, the muscle of a fitness muscle man or the muscle of an army soldier?