1. The company dissolved the labor contract in accordance with the rules and regulations, and there is nothing wrong with it.
A flight attendant of China Southern Airlines is a flight attendant. During working hours (limited flight waiting time), she posted underwear marketing advertisements in the workplace, which violated the company's labor contract. You can't do anything unrelated to work during work, which is something that any company employee must abide by.
The so-called experience she released is a kind of marketing. The implication is that the public interest is used for personal gain. Although it is not direct, it may induce some people to buy, which may bring her economic benefits. This kind of behavior is not allowed by the company. As an old employee who has worked for more than ten years, I naturally know this.
The flight attendant ignored these and insisted on publishing these contents to the circle of friends, which was suspected by WeChat merchants. As a WeChat business, a business license is required. It is estimated that the stewardess may not handle it, so it is also suspected of illegal operation. These are not allowed by the company!
As a stewardess, the stewardess naturally knows the company's regulations. Her behavior has had a negative impact on the company's image, and as a flight attendant, she naturally has a leading role in demonstrating. If she is not punished, she is worried that many flight attendants will follow suit, which will have a great negative impact on airlines. Therefore, it is understandable that the airline chose to terminate the labor contract with her.
2. The staff of China Southern Airlines refused to accept the labor arbitration and filed a lawsuit in court, which disappointed the flight attendants.
The stewardess felt that there was nothing wrong with her behavior. She doesn't recognize the reasons given by the company to terminate the labor contract (using working hours to engage in private affairs, etc.). ), so she filed an arbitration request with the competent labor department. The result came out soon, and the company's practice was illegal, so it was necessary to pay the corresponding amount and reject Guo's other arbitration requests.
Both China Southern Airlines and the flight attendants refused to accept the arbitration result and brought a lawsuit to the court. The results of the first trial soon came out, thinking that the stewardess's behavior was indeed improper, but the circumstances were not very serious. It is wrong for China Southern Airlines to terminate the labor contract. After China Southern knew about it, it filed an appeal.
The court of second instance held that as a flight attendant, she naturally knew her behavior and played a leading role in demonstration, but she ignored it and made a move with great negative demonstration effect. If it is not handled, more people may follow suit, and this negative impact is undoubtedly serious for China Southern Airlines.
The flight attendant's behavior violated social morality and good customs, and the evidence she provided was not enough to prove that the behavior did not cause serious consequences. At the same time, when she did such a thing at work, she was bound to be distracted and didn't put safety responsibility first. It is not improper for the company to terminate the labor contract.
The court of second instance decided to reject the first-instance judgment and let the stewardess bear the corresponding expenses. The judgment of the court of second instance is final, which means that the lawsuit between China Southern Airlines and the female employees ended in the company's victory. The behavior of female employees is not worth advocating, let alone demonstrating.
Third, no matter what happens afterwards, you should think twice before you do anything.
Female employees who make such a circle of friends during their work are indifferent to their work. As an old employee who has worked for more than ten years, she can do the same, which is a wrong demonstration for other employees. Also, an airplane is a means of transportation that requires constant attention to safety regulations.
There have been plane accidents before, some of which were not in place in mechanical inspection and some were not in place in safety assessment. The stewardess's behavior is to ignore the safety regulations, that is, to ignore her job opportunities. It is correct for the company to terminate the labor contract.
Besides, her behavior is really inappropriate. Although it was deleted soon, it was found and reported. This behavior is inconsistent with her professional image and has brought negative influence to the company. For these things, the stewardess should have never thought about it, only thinking about herself. If the interests of the company are ignored, the company has the right to terminate the labor contract.
Some people say that if the stewardess sends out an ordinary advertisement selling oranges instead of underwear marketing advertisements, will she be fired? If you are reported, you should still be fired. Because she did it at work! This shows that we are in the workplace and need to pay attention to our identity.
Work hard during office hours. After work, you can publish such advertisements. Pay attention to screening when publishing. All actions should be considered from the standpoint of the company, so that you can enhance your value. Some people say that the company gives so much money a month, why should it think more about the company?
If this is the concept, the company's development will encounter bottlenecks. Because she didn't consider the problem from the standpoint of the company, she may have made the mistake of this female employee, and the final result is to lose this position. When people look for jobs in middle age, they will know the importance of positions. Do you think this female employee should be fired?