When I was a child, my family was very strict about being taken care of by my parents. Maybe it's just an extreme way for my parents to protect us from harm. I read a similar story in the English drama Black Mirror. Probably about a single mother living with her daughter, because the mother thinks there are too many potential dangers around her children.

And I can't stay at home with my daughter often because of my work. So she installed a smart chip for the child, which can remotely monitor the child's every move, so that the child can get immediate help when in danger.

In addition, the mother also used filters to process all the bloody and violent pictures, making the child look like a mosaic. In the end, because of the mother's overprotection, the child became more rebellious. Finally, she negotiated with her mother to turn off the control, and her daughter lost control and killed her mother. (I can't remember)

Generally speaking, parents should not always think of their children? Double care? In exchange for the child's gratitude, this is actually monitoring and controlling the child, which may cause unexpected lifelong shadows for the child. My parents are fine, but my mother doesn't want me to go to my classmate's house, because it will trouble other people's parents. If I go out by myself, my mother will be worried.

So I have a strong sense of personal safety, probably because my mother instilled in me a strong sense. On April 16, the British "Daily Mail" reported a fitness enthusiast Rashid? Carderas was jailed for child abuse and other crimes.

This controlling father forced his daughter Milla 12 to sign a contract, which won't make her fat, but will exercise a lot until her death. Moreover, Carderas also controls many aspects of children's lives, such as denying them access to the Internet, forbidding them to touch their mobile phones and even giving them room keys.

After a five-day trial, Carderas was finally sentenced to two years in prison for child abuse and two counts of bodily injury.